Wittgenstein against Fraser; a comparative study between Wittgenstein's and Frazer's views on the relationship between religion and scientific rationality.

Author

Ph.D student of moral philosophy, University of Qom

10.22080/jre.2024.26269.1188

Abstract

Frazer and Wittgenstein had a completely different approach to the nature of religion and rationality arising from science. In Frazer's view, scientific rationality is the standard of everything; therefore, he puts religion aside. The result of Frazer's comparison between magic, religion, and science leads to the denial of religious rationality. Frazer's anthropology is based on scientific and rational explanations. According to him, after centuries of displacement in history, science has finally obtained the golden key that opens the doors of nature's treasure. Wittgenstein criticizes Frazer's opinions based on his fundamental thinking about the meta-rationality of faith. He rejects any rational and scientific explanation of religion. According to Wittgenstein, the language game of religion and the language game of science differ. Frazer cannot compare the rationality of believers' religiosity with the criteria of rationality in science and sees and despises the believers as completely wrong. This study, by analyzing Frazer's and Wittgenstein's opinions and after examining the conflict, will reveal why Frazer's criticisms of scientific rationality failed and how Wittgenstein, using metaphors such as language games and the form of life, freed religious rationality from the trap of Frazer's narrow-minded scientific criteria.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

احمدی، بابک( 1375) کتاب تردید، نشر مرکز، تهران.
استرول، اوروم(1384)  فلسفة تحلیلی در قرن بیستم، ترجمة فریدون فاطمی، نشر مرکز، تهران.  
حسینی، مالک ) 1389)  ویتگنشتاین و حکمت، نشر هرمس، تهران.
فروند، ژولین(1368  ( جامعه‏شناسى ماکس وبر، ترجمه عبدالحسین نیک گهر، رایزن، تهران.
فریزر، جرج(1383)  شاخه زرین ،ترجمه کاظم فیروزمند ،انتشارات اگاه، تهران.
ملکیان، مصطفی  (1381 ) راهى به رهایى، تهران: نشر نگاه معاصر، تهران.
هادسون، ویلیام دانالد(1378 ) ویتگنشتاین، ترجمه ملکیان، گروس، تهران.
ویتگنشتاین، لودیگ(1385) کتاب آبی، مالک حسینی، نشر هرمس، تهران.
ویتگنشتاین، لودیگ(1388) درباره دین و اخلاق ، مالک حسینی، نشر هرمس، تهران.
 
Drury, M )1981(  Some notes on conversation with wittgenstein, Blackwell.
Glock ,  H (1996) A wittgenstein dictionary, Oxford.
Malcolm, N) 2001 ( Ludwig Wittgenstein: A Memoir, slarenbon press.
Malcolm, N (1964) It is religious belief that god exist?  In:  faith and philosophers, ed. John hick, London, Macmillan
Monk , R )2005(  in: Philosophy, Basic Readings, Edited by Nigel Warburton. Routledge.
Philips, D. Z) 1970( Faith and Philosophical Enquiry, London: R. & KP.
Sherry, Patrick )1972 (Is Religion Form of Life,  American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 9. No. 2.
Sorell, T )1994( Scientism: philosophy and the infatuation of science, routledge university press.
Stiver, D (1997) The philosophy of religios language, oxford, London.
Von wright, G.H (1982) Wittgenstein in relation to his times. Blackwell.
Wellmuth, J )1944( The nature and origins of scientism, milwaukee  university press.
Wiliams , R  )2015( Scientism: The new orthodoxy,  Bloomsbury  publication.
Winch, P) 1995( The Idea of a Social Science, 2nd edition, London: Routledge.
Wittgenstein, L )1989(  Culture and Value, Trans. P. Winc, Basil Black Well.
Wittgenstein, L )1974( On certainity,trans anscomb, black well.
Wittgenstein, L (1995) Remark on frazer golden bought, ed. rush rhee, franc. a.c.mils 
Wittgenstein, L (1998) philosophical investigation, Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, l (1978) lectures and conversation on aesthetic, psychology and religion belief, Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L ) 1966) Lectute and conversation on aesthetic, psychology and religion belief, Blackwell.
 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics