Examining the theological view of Nicholaus Cusanus about the representation of the divine in the image

Authors

1 PhD Candidate, Philosophy Department, Literature& Foreign Language, Allame Tabatabai, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor of Philosophy Department, Literature& Foreign Language, Allame Tabatabai, Tehran, Iran

10.22080/jre.2024.28010.1217

Abstract

In his treatise De Visione Dei which seems to have been written in response to the question of the monks who asked him about how to see God, Cusanus discusses his theological theory in the form of analyzing the paintings that, according to him, were able to depict a type of God that more than anything else is aligned with his perception of God as a non-other. In this article, after the introduction, an account of Cusanus’ theological view of God will be given, and then an attempt will be made to deal with the elemental features in the mentioned paintings that Cusanus called "the all-seeing eye". The all-seeing eye is a factor in these paintings, which, according to Cusanus, can introduce us to an aspect of God that is different from conventional metaphysical perceptions, that is, in this new perspective, God is no longer in sameness or otherness with the creation. Instead, he is the non-otherness of this world. This article tries to investigate and detail this issue.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. رنجبر, ابراهیم, & کلباسی اشتری, حسین. (1403). نا-دیگری: خداوند در فلسفۀ نیکولاس کوسانوس. مجله علمی " فلسفه دین ", 21(1), 59-73. doi: 22059/jpht.2024.375044.1006040
  2. Ackermans, H. (ed.). (1985). Qu’est-ce que Dieu ?(1–). Presses universitaires Saint-Louis Bruxelles. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pusl.7065
  3. Binet Alfred. Le mystère de la peinture. In: L'année psychologique. 1908 vol. 15. pp. 300-315.
  4. Dekoninck Ralph « Voir l’image vivante. L’anamorphose visionnaire entre texte et image », dans B. Selmeci Castioni et A. Paschoud (éds), Exprimer la vision spirituelle (XIVe-XVIIe siècles), Louvain, 2016, p. 167-181.
  5. Deleuze, Gills,(2023), Sur Le Peinture, Édition préparée par David Lapoujade, Les Edtions de Minuit, Paris.
  6. Erwin Panofsky, Les Primitifs flamands, Paris, 1992 (1ère éd. 1953),
  7. Geiger, L. B. (1974). L’HOMME, IMAGE DE DIEU: À PROPOS DE “SUMMA THEOLOGIAE”, Ia, 93, 4. Rivista Di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica, 66(2/4), 511–532. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43069880
  8. Maurice Merleau-Ponty,( 1964) Le Visible et l’Invisible, Paris.
  9. (1992). The Elements of Theology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  10. , Heil, G., Suchla, B. R., Ritter, A. M. (1990). Corpus Dionysiacum. Germany: W. de Gruyter.
  11. Sancti Thomae Aquinatis opera omnia. (1948) Edition of Vernon J. Bourke. 8 vol. New York, vol. 6 and 7.
  12. Von Kues, N. (1967). Werke. 2 Bände. Berlin: De Gruyter Berlin