The Philosophical Implications of Neo-Darwinian Naturalism in Explaining the Meaning of Life: An Assessment of John Cottingham's Critiques

Authors

1 university of Tehran

2 Tehran university

10.22080/jepr.2026.31535.1329

Abstract

In the contemporary era, the paradigm of ontological naturalism has achieved such dominance that it has permeated various domains of knowledge, notably the realm of the meaning of life. In response to the problem of meaning, naturalists have adopted diverse approaches: one group, embracing scientific nihilism, posits that science has demonstrated the universe to be devoid of any objective meaning or purpose; others, adopting a subjectivist approach, deny meaning any external reality, regarding it as a subjective phenomenon contingent upon personal satisfaction; another faction employs evolutionary genealogy (biological reductionism) to interpret human meaning and values purely in terms of survival mechanisms and evolutionary processes; while yet another cohort utilizes objectivist approaches in an attempt to discover objective foundations for meaning within the material world itself, without resorting to the supernatural
Many of these approaches have been subjected to rigorous critique by thinkers such as John Cottingham,He levels fundamental criticisms against naturalistic frameworks, contending that none provide an adequate response to the problem of meaning. The present study employs an analytical-critical approach to examine these critiques in order to evaluate their validity . An analysis of Cottingham’s perspective and the foundations of naturalism reveals that his primary criticisms are entirely sound; for these approaches not only conflict with our deepest moral intuitions, but they also fail to provide a proper interpretation of meaningfulness within the realm of lived experience, ultimately leading to an existential vacuum. Consequently, to attain authentic meaning, there is no alternative but to return to a metaphysical framework.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

علی‌زمانی، امیرعباس؛ و دریانی‌اصل، مریم. (۱۳۸۹). «معنای زندگی از دیدگاه جان کاتینگهام». نشریه الهیات تطبیقی، سال اول، شماره ۳، صص ۹۵-۱۱۸.
امامی‌فر، حمید؛ و مهدوی اطهر، مهدی. (۱۴۰۱). «بررسی تحلیلی نسبت نظریه «تکامل» با خداباوری و الحاد». نشریه معرفت کلامی، سال سیزدهم، شماره ۲۸، بهار و تابستان ۱۴۰۱.
نریمانی، نیما. (۱۴۰۰). طبیعت‌گرایی روش‌شناختی در علم. فلسفه علم، ۱۱(۱)، ۲۵۳-۲۷۸. 
میرباباپور، سید مصطفی. (۱۳۹۶). مفهوم‌شناسی طبیعت‌گرایی روش‌شناختی به مثابه یک ابر پارادایم برای علم مدرن. تأملات فلسفی، ۷(۱۹)، ۲۱۳-۲۴۲.
Behe, M. J. (1996). Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. New York: Free Press.
Carnap, R. (1959). The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language (A. Pap, Trans.). In A. J. Ayer (Ed.), Logical Positivism (pp. 60–81). New York, NY: Free Press.
Cottingham, J. (2003). On the Meaning of Life. London & New York: Routledge.
Cottingham, J. (2005). The spiritual dimension: Religion, philosophy and human value. Cambridge University Press.
Cottingham, J. (2009). Why believe. Continuum.
Cottingham, J. (2011). Reply to Holland: The meaning of life and Darwinism. Environmental Values, 20(3), 299–308.
Cottingham, J. (2014). Philosophy of religion: Towards a more humane approach. Cambridge University Press.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray.
Dawkins, R. (2006). The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe Without Design. London: Penguin Books.
Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. London, England: Penguin Books.
Frankfurt, H. G. (2004). The Reasons of Love. Princeton University Press.
Futuyma, D. J., & Kirkpatrick, M. (2017). Evolution. Sinauer Associates.
Jacob, F. (1977). Evolution and tinkering. Science, 196(4295).
Holland, A. (2009). Darwin and the meaning in life. Environmental Values, 18(4), 503–518.
Huxley, J. (1942). Evolution: The modern synthesis. George Allen & Unwin.
Klemke, E. D., & Cahn, S. M. (Eds.). (2017). The meaning of life: A reader (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Metz, T. (2013). Meaning in life: An analytic study. Oxford University Press.
Midgley, M. (1985). Evolution as a Religion: Strange Hopes and Stranger Fears. London, England: Methuen & Co. Ltd.
Monod, J. (1971). Chance and necessity: An essay on the natural philosophy of modern biology (A. Wainhouse, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books. (Original work published 1970).
Nagel, T. (2012). Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Plantinga, A. (2011). Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Rachels, J. (1990). Created from animals: The moral implications of Darwinism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rosenberg, A. (2011). The Atheist’s Guide to Reality: Enjoying Life without Illusions. W. W. Norton & Company.
Ruse, M. (2008). Evolution and Religion: A Dialogue. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Ruse, M., & Wilson, E. O. (1986). Moral philosophy as applied science. Philosophy, 61(236), 173–192.
Sagan, C. (1994). Pale blue dot: A vision of the human future in space. New York: Random House.
Simpson, G. G. (1951). The meaning of evolution (Rev. ed.). New York: Mentor Books.
Street, S. (2006). A Darwinian dilemma for realist theories of value. Philosophical Studies, 127(1), 109–166.
Stewart, J. E. (2010). The meaning of life in a developing universe. Foundations of Science, 15, 395–409.
Tartaglia, J. (2016). Philosophy in a meaningless life: A system of nihilism, consciousness and reality. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Weikart, R. (2016). The death of humanity: And the case for life. Salem Books.
Wilson, E. O. (2004). On Human Nature (Revised ed.). Harvard University Press

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics