Comparison and matching of the interpretation of the physical resurrection from the point of view of Mulla Sadra and Allameh tabatabai

Authors

1 Associate prof of philosophy Department, Faculty of Theology, University of Ilam. Iran

2 Master”s student of philosophy in university of Ilam

3 Ph.D student of philosophy in university of Ilam

10.22080/jepr.2025.28715.1264

Abstract

In thefield of philosophy، making an argument to prove issues has a special place and the proof of physical resurrection has been faced by philosophers and theologians as a fundamental challenge throughout history، to the extent that some of the great philosophers of islam have been unable to prove it with rational proofs and believed in its realization just to adhere to the shariah.In this passage، great philosophers such as mulla sadra and Allameh tabatabai have tried to prove some of the principles of physical resurrection with intellectual proofs، In parallel with observance of the shria and even though Allameh is a follower of MollaSadras in the field of philosophy.But in field ofproving bodily resurrection؛ He has presented some different opinions from him and sometimes fundamental difference in their view to prove bodily resurrection is visible.By relying on his philosophical innovations، Mulla Sadra and Allameh have explained the issues related to the physical resurrection of man by choosing method of interpreting the resurrection verse by verse And both have this claim Their method to prove bodily resurrection hasnot been considered by philosophers or commentators before them. Of course، their approach in the field of physical development doesnot comprehensively and completely explain all the issues that follow from it and some of their opinions are still discussed and criticized by the seekers of knowledge.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics