A Critical Examination of David Hume’s Susceptibility to the Science of His Time in His Turn toward a Critical Conception of the Principle of Causation

Authors

1 Postdoctoral Researcher in Philosophy, Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

2 Professor of Philosophy, Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

10.22080/jepr.2025.29898.1292

Abstract

David Hume’s significance in the intellectual transformations of the Enlightenment is undeniable. On the one hand, he maintained a deep commitment to the scientific outlook and the achievements of modern science; on the other, he adopted one of the most critical perspectives on religion and the idea of God. Hume extensively drew upon the scientific knowledge of his age to reinforce his skeptical arguments against traditional theology. One of the most prominent domains of this engagement was his critique of the principle of causality—a principle that held a central place in classical arguments for the existence of God. By employing the scientific and philosophical advances of his time, Hume argued that causality is not an objective necessity inherent in the world but rather a mental and psychological habit formed through the repetition of experience. Consequently, reliance on the principle of causality as a foundation for proving God’s existence and explaining the relationship between the world and a transcendent origin loses its philosophical validity. This article critically examines how Hume’s encounter with contemporary science shaped his skeptical stance on causality and explores the implications of this critique for religious rationality.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

بیکن، فرانسیس (1402). نو ارغنون. ترجمه محمود صناعی. چاپ دهم. تهران: نشر جامی.
کاپلستون، فردریک (1388). تاریخ فلسفه. ترجمه جلال­الدین مجتبوی. چاپ پنجم. تهران: انتشارات علمی فرهنگی.
کانت، ایمانوئل (1384). تمهیدات: مقدمه­ای برای هر مابعدالطبیعه آینده که به­عنوان یک علم عرضه شود. ترجمه غلام­علی حداد عادل. چاپ اول. تهران: انتشارات مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
کی­یرکگور، سورن (1401). ترس و لرز. ترجمه صادق نوری. چاپ اول. تهران: انتشارات سولار.
لاک، جان (1399). جستاری درخصوص فاهمه بشری. ترجمه کاوه لاجوردی. چاپ اول. تهران: نشر مرکز.
مکارم شیرازی، ناصر (1374). تفسیر نمونه. کتاب اول. چاپ اول، تهران: انتشارات دارالکتب الاسلامیه.
نیوتن، آیزاک (1403). اصول ریاضی فلسفه طبیعی. ترجمه بهنام شیخ باقری. چاپ پنجم. تهران: نشر رخداد نو.
هیوم، دیوید (1395). رساله­ای درباره طبیعت آدمی. کتاب اول. ترجمه جلال پیکانی. چاپ اول. تهران: انتشارات ققنوس.
هیوم، دیوید (1396). گفت­و­گوهایی درباره دین طبیعی (خوانشی دیگر). ترجمه رسول رسولی­پور و سوده مهتاب­پور. چاپ اول. تهران: انتشارات حکمت.
هیوم، دیوید (1397). کاوشی درخصوص فهم بشری. ترجمه کاوه لاجوردی. چاپ چهارم. تهران: نشر مرکز.
 
Baxter, Andrew (1990). An Enquiry into the Nature of the Human Soul, Wherein the Immateriality of the Soul is evinced from the Principles of Reason and Philosophy. 2nd ed. 2 vols. London.
Clarke, Samuel (1978). The Works. 4 vols. London.
Cudworth, Ralph (1845). True Intellectual System of the Universe: Wherein All the Reason and Philosophy of Atheism is Confuted, and its Impossibility Demonstrated. 3 vols. Translated by J. Harrison. London: Thomas Tegg.
Hume, David )1938). An Abstract of a Treatise of Human Nature. reprinted in T.
Hume, David) 1985(. Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary. edited by E. F. Miller. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.
James, William (1897). The Will to Believe: And Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. India: Longmans, Green, and Company.
James, William (2009). The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study In Human Nature. Australia: Floating Press
Rowe, William L (1998). The Cosmological Argument. New York: Fordham University Press.
Warburton, William (1841). “A Charge on the Study of Theology.” In A Selection from Unpublished Papers of the Right Reverend William Warburton, edited by Rev. F. Kilveret. London.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics